- Gu Xiaojunism: Trade Wars • 3969

Overseas media reports "Troppu announced that the CCP's 200 billion US dollars of goods will be subject to a 10% tariff increase to 25% at the end of the year." Article: The US Trump administration announced on the 17th that it will add another 10% to the US＄200 billion imports from mainland China. Tariffs will take effect on September 24, and the tax rate will be adjusted from 10% to 25% by the end of the year. And warned that if the CCP takes revenge against American farmers or other industries, the US will immediately proceed to the third stage, which will impose additional tariffs on the US＄267 billion in mainland goods exported to the United States.

Just before Trump announced a further tariff on imports of 200 billion U.S. dollars in mainland China, a large number of articles overseas have been discussing "the Sino-US trade war or escalation, the U.S. tariff on China’s 200 billion U.S. dollars," and so on. Mention

Sino-US trade wars on the lives of Chinese people 中美贸易战事关国人的生活

- Gu Xiaojunism: Trade Wars • 3968

I have seen me, a friend of the article "The Boxer" in the Sino-US trade war, which was recorded in the small pink speech in Baidu's "China-US Trade War". Naturally, I know that Xiao Pink and the Boxer are against China and the United States. The attitude of the trade war.

Of course, most of the people? Affected by the CCP's many years of propaganda and indoctrination, the idea of the Chinese people also seems to be a small pink, "Yihe Tuan". So what about the rest? The rest of the people should have a large part, in confusion and wait and see.

Therefore, let the people who are confused and wait-and-see clear that the relationship between the Sino-US trade war and our 

——Gu Xiaojunism: New Democracy • 3967

Last night, I finally completed the "Analysis of the "Enduring War" in the Sino-US trade war." I was very happy. I spent the rest of the time playing for a while (if I don't play, my eyes really won't work).

Woke up in the morning, I thought of something. When I got on the computer, I first looked at the ladder. When I saw the ladder, I went to the Blogger and pushed a dozen articles. It was also a "retaliation" for two days.

I never thought about it, but created a new peak on my blogger. I haven't seen it for two days, and my overseas friends are thirsty. I want to laugh when I think of Liu Gang’s announcement of his visit. Just playing this way, all the things that I thought of were forgotten.

Organize the materials and delete all used ones. Yesterday, a friend of the Gu Powder Group said, "I really like your "Trade War", 

Analysis of the "Enduring War" in Sino-US Trade War 中美贸易战之「持久战」分析

- Gu Xiaojunism: Trade Wars • 3966

2018-9-10~11, after writing "Combing the roots of Sino-US trade warfare" and sending it to Blogger, the ladder was broken, and other important articles could not be sent out.

The friends of Gu's fans are calling: "My Athens can't see Mr.'s article." "I haven't seen it for a long time. I can go to my own, but my husband can't open it." Opened, you can see the catalog, but you can't open it."

Obviously, it is the fault of my book "Trade Wars." Just after the "China-US trade war", the original "China-US trade war" entry of Baidu Encyclopedia became a "China-US trade dispute." The CCP has adopted the "ostrich policy". Does it prove that this "trade war" is necessary?

I can't see the new information, and I don't know what to say overseas. Then I will sort out and analyze the

Premier Huang of Bo XiLai‘s leading group, plagiarized Gu Xiaojun's philosophical ideas 薄班底的黄总理剽窃顾晓军的哲学思想

- Gu Xiaojunism: New Democratic movement • 3965

When I saw Wind North blowing's "Make it simple or easy" philosophy of Mr. Gu Xiaojun was plagiarized, I realized that the CCP had "sounded a big and big chess" to block me, by Bo Xilai. Premier Huang Qifan of the team came forward and plagiarized my "make it simple or easy".

However, the concepts of “make it more complicated” and “make it simple or easy” are my brain revolution (ISBN 9789869198103, published in Taiwan on July 1, 2015) and GuXiaojunist Philosophy (English version) ( ISBN 9789863586678, published on September 1st, 2018 in Taiwan) The basis for writing and writing.

In other words, this is my initial thoughts when I was under the age of twenty (see "The Shell and the Philosophy of Philosophy in GuXiaojunist Philosophy"), and the philosophy of "Gu Xiaojunism" was created at the age of 55. (See "Gu Xiaojunism" on the Internet, "The Lies of the Primitive Communism", "The Nightmare of Scientific Communism", "Trends", "Re-discussion Trends", 

Sorting out the roots of Sino-US trade war 梳理中美贸易战的根源

- Gu Xiaojunism: Trade Wars • 3964

So far, the Sino-US trade war has been almost half a year, and all kinds of articles are really not too small. It seems that it seems that they have not really found the root cause.

My thinking has also been a while. When I found the root cause of the Sino-US trade war, it was not clear in a few words. Therefore, I thought of using the method of layering bamboo shoots to sort out the Sino-US trade war.

Some overseas sources said, "Some people know that the CCP is not good, but may think that the CCP infringes on the United States in trade and makes it cheap to make China strong. Then we don't follow it? Wrong! The CCP does not abide by trade rules. It not only harms the United States, but also harms the interests of the Chinese people. Why is it so expensive to import things from China? Is it because of the 

How does the CCP steal US intellectual property rights?  

中共是怎么窃取美国知识產权的？

- Gu Xiaojunism: Trade Wars • 3963

In Trump’s statement, "The CCP has stolen US intellectual property rights and used export subsidies and other measures to greatly damage the interests of the United States. Now it is necessary to punish the CCP by adding tariffs. For the United States, this is a war of the Great Patriotic War." In the middle, "the CCP steals US intellectual property rights" is a difficult point. My "hidden stage in the trade war" is mentioned, but it has not been clarified. Today, let me expand.

Google can see that "US Members: China's all-round stealing of intellectual property rights", "Ministerial Committee: US intellectual property rights stolen 600 billion CCP is the culprit", "more American companies blame the CCP for stealing intellectual property rights", "Zhu Wanli : How does the CCP steal US intellectual property rights and introduce cases of indictment? <How does the CCP specifically steal intellectual property 

——Gu Xiaojunism: Jottings • 3962

The wave heart projection in the Gufen group greatly appreciated my recent article. However, in recent articles, I wrote very hard. The riots of the CCP hackers will not be said. I thought that writing "Trade Wars" could avoid direct conflicts, but I didn't expect troubles to become commonplace.

Of course, the difficulty of writing "Trade Warfare" is really not the hacker's disorder, but the reserve of knowledge and thinking ability in economics. If so, when I saw Liu Weihui’s 10 WeChat yesterday, I quickly evaded the "Trade War" and played a book "Reading, Writing, and Communication."

Not to mention, after playing a book, "Reading, Writing, and Communication," there is no constant pressure to write an article in the book "Trade Wars" every day. I never thought, in today's rush. What is the essence of "economic aggression"? 〉, but special smooth (I mean the logical relationship in the article, etc.).

Last night, Liu Lihui sent me another 11 WeChat, and I can escape the pressure of the book "Trade Wars" - choose two of them, 

What is the essence of today's "economic aggression"? 当今「经济侵略」的实质是什么？

- Gu Xiaojunism: Trade Wars • 3961

The term "economic aggression" is now very popular. On December 18, 2017, FT Chinese Network reported that when Trump would accuse China of "economic aggression", no one paid attention to this term. On March 22, 2018, Trump’s "China Economic Aggression Memorandum" should be what most Chinese believe. "President Trump signed the "Memorandum of the President on the tariffs on Chinese exports to the United States" at the White House."

On March 22, 2018, did President Trump sign two memorandums? Shouldn't it? Then, it should be - the same memo, the differences between China and the United States and the differences reflected in the

——Gu Xiaojunism: Jottings • 3960

Liu Lihui's "Leading to China's Democracy and Freedom - Reading "September Capriccio"] has been read and forwarded.

I want to write this essay and talk about my views on the three topics of "Reading, Writing, and Communication" in Liu Lihui's articles and messages.

Reading

Liu Lihui mentioned the interest, utilitarianism and non-utilitarian nature of reading.

I do not agree with "non-utilitarianity." Because we are neither children, we need to lay the foundation, we are not farming society, farming time, there are so many leisure time. Therefore, I advocate interest,