改变 - 優仕網部落格

優仕網部落格優質部落格精選文章
自然
行事曆
S M T W T F S
            1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30           
站長

Gdlf Gdlf
♀ 39
部落格分類
文章分類
常用標籤
最新回應
Updates occur every 60 minutes.
瀏覽統計
Google+ 圈圈
恢复1
Trade war is a war of thought 贸易战是场思想的战争

- Gu Xiaojunist: Trade war • 3954



On the surface, the trade war is a commercial war and a market war. In fact, the trade war has always been a war of thought.


From the analysis of the "hidden stage in the trade war", it can be seen that the trade war is caused by emerging economies that do not have the ability to form self-digestion, and the export of products and funds and management.


At the beginning of the Sino-US trade war (Baidu "China-US trade war": "On March 22, 2018, US President Trump signed a levy on China's exports to the US at the White House... March 23, 2018, China's Ministry of Commerce Published for the United States ...), I pointed out in the "Gu Xiaojun political talks (China-US trade war, etc.)" (2018-4-14, article and video) pointed out that "China-US trade war, the mainland must lose. This loss is not lost at one time, but lost at the root. "Why does the mainland say that the mainland will lose and lose on the roots?" Because of 

Trade war is a war of thought 贸易战是场思想的战争

- Gu Xiaojunist: Trade war • 3954

On the surface, the trade war is a commercial war and a market war. In fact, the trade war has always been a war of thought.

From the analysis of the "hidden stage in the trade war", it can be seen that the trade war is caused by emerging economies that do not have the ability to form self-digestion, and the export of products and funds and management.

At the beginning of the Sino-US trade war (Baidu "China-US trade war": "On March 22, 2018, US President Trump signed a levy on China's exports to the US at the White House... March 23, 2018, China's Ministry of Commerce Published for the United States ...), I pointed out in the "Gu Xiaojun political talks (China-US trade war, etc.)" (2018-4-14, article and video) pointed out that "China-US trade war, the mainland must lose. This loss is not lost at one time, but lost at the root. "Why does the mainland say that the mainland will lose and lose on the roots?" Because of the Sino-US trade war, it is the defense of the free economy."

2018-8-27, Trump said "for the United States, this is a war of the Patriotic War." This is the earliest expression I have seen, Trump (see "Wang Yushan's sudden talk about the trade war signal is not a big reason for the two major reasons".

In the "defense war", I coincided with Trump. How can a Chinese folk thinker coincide with the formulation of the US president? Because the two have the same ideas and similarities. In other words, the foundation of the two thoughts, the direction of the thought, or the starting point of the ideology is the same. In this way, the same statement will appear.

On the contrary, the CCP has been misjudged the United States and misjudged Trump. The CCP’s repeated misjudgments in the Sino-US trade war, the most classic proof, are Wang Huning’s “missing” before the Beidaihe meeting and various overseas analysis and rumors, as well as the mainland’s criticism of Hu Angang. If it is not Wang Huning’s misjudgment and misinformation, how can there be rumors and analysis of “missing”?

It is reasonable to say that the trade war is also a war; if it is a war, it should be "knowing ourselves and knowing each other. Then, the CCP and Wang Huning and Hu Angang do not understand "knowing oneself and knowing each other, there is no war" or is there other reasons?

In the "China-US trade war is a war of ideological theory," I said that the CCP is the best at playing "a big and big piece of chess", playing Tianji horse racing and thirty-six meters, etc. Obviously, the CCP is the way to deepen Sun Tzu’s art of war. of. So, where is the CCP lost?

In fact, it has been clearly stated in the "China-US trade war is a war of ideological theory." The CCP loses its losses in thought, and loses in all kinds of bans on new ideas. As for the Sino-US trade war, the Chinese Communist Party started to work on April 9 and 10, 2018. Sun Liping, who was called "Xi Jinping's mentor" overseas, published "about trade wars." Three points of view > and "What is happening in the world - four interesting formulations" article.

In order to win the war of the idea of this trade war, Sun Liping in the "What is happening in the world - four interesting formulations", the relevant ideas of my trade war between China and the United States, to teach and "Xi Jinping's mentor" The identity is given to others, and the CCP’s strategy of blocking me is implemented. In fact, the war of such thoughts has a long history. Shi Sansheng published on September 9, 2012, "The party has no thoughts is not the fault of the people" (see "Recommended to the Nobel Peace Prize, Literature Award Gu Xiaojun" ISBN 9789863586272).

Say that Sun Liping puts my thoughts on the trade war between China and the United States, "give them to others separately", and only needs to start "what is happening in the world - four interesting formulations" - "The first formulation: the past 40 years Globalization is facing liquidation. This is proposed by Mr. Liu Yuhui." mean! In my "Gu Xiaojun's Political Consultation (China-US Trade Warfare, etc.)", there is a chapter on "II. Global Economic Integration" and pointed out that "the mainland is not only the United States is trade protectionism, but another weapon is the global economy." The integration of the global economy is actually the law of the forest. “Why does the global economic integration be the law of the forest? Because the integration of the global economy is actually a strong-led economy. That is to say, the strong is the world’s economy. Division of labor.” Moreover, my reflection and criticism of “global economic integration” has already begun (see “Chuanpu Economy, and Wu Huilin” in 2017-2-15).

“The second formulation: Trump is not just a single individual, but a leader of an emerging social movement. This is proposed by Mr. Wen Yang, a researcher at the China Research Institute of Fudan University.” “The third formulation: the elite Made a mistake, the fate is in the hands of the little man. This is the one proposed by Bannon, and this "second formulation" and "third formulation" is the division of my "Populist democracy" (see Community Impartiality First, ISBN 9789869269346, published in April 2016; Populist democratic ISBN 9789869337243, published in October 2016), and presented to Wen Yang and Bannon (see Wind North blowing) in essence, Populist democratic - by Sun Liping [What is happening in the world - four interesting formulations] I think of, "Forest Son's "Gu Xiaojun's Front and Sun Liping's Short-sightedness" and Shi Sansheng's recent "They are blocking the theoretical support of Gu Xiaojun against Trump" Etc., and 2016-09-15 Dabao thief turned to "the rise of the global underlying society" when "forwarding: Dr. Peking University is demonstrating the "Populist democrati" proposed by Mr. Gu Xiaojun The existence and feasibility of c'.")

Sun Liping’s "fourth formulation: China’s overall strength has surpassed that of the United States and has become the world’s number one. This was proposed by Professor Hu Angang,” apparently a piecemeal; because the first three “representations” are holistic. In this way, it is even more difficult to see that Sun Liping’s "What is happening in the world - four interesting formulations" is aimed at the trade war, the plundering of my thoughts and theories, and the deliberate dismemberment of the Sino-US trade war. The front of the free economy side.

Sun Liping, painstakingly hitting the combination of "On the trade war, only three points of view" on April 9, 2018, and on April 10, 2018, "What is happening in the world - four interesting formulas" It is also the opening for Wang Huning’s "Marx is right" - Baidu Encyclopedia "Marx is right": April 27, 2018 to 9:00 pm on May 1, "Marx is right" premiered on CCTV's comprehensive channel , the People's Network, Xinhuanet and other media platforms launched simultaneously. "Marx is Right" is a five-episode popular theory dialogue program jointly produced by the Central Propaganda Department Theory Bureau, the Jiangsu Provincial Party Committee Propaganda Department, and the Jiangsu Provincial Radio and Television Headquarters.

Is it so clever? "Central Propaganda Department and Jiangsu" "co-production"? The CCP is the best at playing "a big and big piece of chess". Its "exquisite" is that it seems to be very casual, but it is always deliberate, carefully planned, and cleverly arranged. If I am not living in Nanjing, will the Central Propaganda Department jointly produce with Jiangsu?

However, with the emergence of Wang Huning’s "Awesome, My Country" and "Marx is Right", "The United States is afraid of", "I am afraid of the body", "Wearing the body", "Frightening the body" "Scared", "Europe has regretted" and so on, but strengthened the determination of Trump to fight this trade war.

I don't know - is this the "high-level black" of the ideological and theoretical type? However, in fact, Wang Huning, Sun Liping, Hu Angang, etc., sent Xi Jinping to the cusp. Because the Sino-US trade war is a war of thought that the CCP can't win and can't afford to lose. If the CCP is defeated, Xi Jinping’s nickname is only to overcome Jiang Zemin.

Then, how do you understand that "the Sino-US trade war is a war of thought that the CCP can't win, and can't afford to lose?" "I can't afford to lose", it's very easy to understand - if you lose, it is really a "CCP economic collapse theory" becomes a reality. And once the CCP’s economy collapses, the CCP can still “be a good day today, what can be thought of?”

In the "winning" and "war of thought", I have long been in "Gu Xiaojun's political talks (China-US trade war, etc.), "China-US trade war" and "China-US trade war is a war of ideological theory", etc. The article has already stated clearly - "Why does the mainland say that the mainland must lose and lose on the roots? Because the Sino-US trade war is a defense of the free economy." What is the nature of the Sino-US trade war? The market economy will continue to develop. The economy cannot be intervened, and the market must have the final say. "The mainland cannot even implement freedom of speech. How can there be a real free economy?"

The trade war, in the final analysis - "is an advanced social form and a backward social form of war. Specifically, it is the ability of the society to correct mistakes." "The US-Soviet Cold War, the Sino-US trade war, or actually fight is not The arms race is not a trade war, but an advanced social form and a backward social form of war. Specifically, it is the ability of the society to correct mistakes. Because the democratic society comes with corrective mechanisms, and socialism does not bring its own corrections. The wrong mechanism, so it will inevitably lose.

The advanced and backward social forms reflect the thoughts? Therefore, Mrs. Thatcher dared to say, "You don't have to worry about China at all, because China will not be able to give the world any new ideas in the next few decades or even a hundred years." However, Mrs. Thatcher is wrong - she It is to follow the CCP’s thinking of the mainstream society and say, “You don’t have to worry about China at all”, and ignore the fact that the society in the fission period is the easiest to think.

2018-8-20, I am in the CCP how to resolve the trade war? 〉 It is proposed to “squeeze the privileged economy, consolidate wealth with the people, establish a system and policy of a real consumer economy, including democratization of politics and society.” Among them, “establish a system and policy of a true consumer economy” It is the key; because emerging economies that do not have the ability to self-digest, will inevitably export products and funds and management.

The "democratization of politics and society" is by no means the creator of my "Populist democratic" ideology, imposed on the CCP during the crisis. First, in the three books "Brain Revolution" (ISBN 9789869198103, published in July 2015) "Community Impartiality First" and "Populist democratic", I have repeatedly stated that market economy and political democracy are an economic basis. The superstructure is complete. The supporting of socialism is the planned economy. Socialism, after the planned economy can't go on, will bring the "market economy"; of course, this kind of bringing in will eventually ruin socialism. Because such grafting is not convinced.

Of course, the CCP may consider returning to the planned economy (this was said during the Beidaihe meeting). However, in fact, the CCP has not returned; because, "reform and opening up" has already undermined the foundation of the implementation of the planned economy and the ignorance of the people.

Second, until the leaders of the market economy can't tolerate it – when there is no emerging economy that is self-digesting, and when exporting products and funds and management, the trade war will inevitably start. This is not just for the CCP. In Japan, which rose in the 1970s, in the 1980s, the United States forced them to follow suit and force them to establish a system of true consumer economy. Taiwan is also very similar.

Song Chuyu talked about Jiang Jingguo and the article "87 Jie Yan", mentioned one or two years before "87 Jie Yan" (I can't remember the specific time), the United States sent representatives to negotiate... This negotiation is absolutely impossible to talk specifically "Understanding the strictness." I thought that the US delegation should talk about how to solve the problem of low prices, dumping, and establishing a system of true consumer economy. "Resolving the strictness" is only a logical and inevitable match between the market economy and modern democratic politics.

Through my "trade war" and "hidden stage in the trade war", it is known that the trade war is the original market economy, the emerging economic system that does not form self-digesting ability, the output of products and funds And resistance during management. Therefore, the original market economy is playing a trade war and is just. Japan and Taiwan have established a system of true consumption-oriented economy and Taiwan’s "87 solution to strictness" is a natural trend; similarly, it is also a matter of public opinion.

On the issue of trade wars, the CCP’s backwardness at the ideological level is the backwardness of two cascades. The first step is that Marxism is now abandoned by the world. Saying "Marx is right," but he is talking about himself. I am not going to use any preparations, I can go to CCTV to debate with anyone at any time. And CCTV, can you let me say? The second step is that modern democracy has quietly entered the stage of “Populist democratic”. I have discussed both "Populist democratic" and "China New Democratic movement" (ISBN 9789863586371, published in May 2018). Moreover, the general elections of the United States and Taiwan have also been fully demonstrated. Even the "second formulation" and "third formulation" of Sun Liping's viciousness also indirectly acknowledge the arrival of "Populist democracy".

Therefore, the trade war is a war of thought. And through me, "The Sino-US trade war is fighting the defense of the free economy." Trump said, "For the United States, this is a war of the Patriotic War." Through Sun Liping, he made two articles and plundered me. Thoughts and theories, in order to reach the front of the free economic side of the dismembered trade war, through Sun Liping, Wang Huning’s "Marx is right", clearing the way, encircling me living in Nanjing, and "awesome, my country", "the United States is afraid However, "Japan is scared" and "Europe regrets" has strengthened the determination of Trump's trade war, and I proposed "the system and policy of squeezing the elite economy, hiding wealth and the people, and building a true consumer economy." "And the establishment of a consumer economy is a necessity, and the CCP’s backward two steps at the ideological level, etc., is the Sino-US trade war not a war of thought?

It proves that "trade war is a war of thought" and this article should be over. However, I would like to explain one point: In fact, this article is not very concerned about proving that "the Sino-US trade war, the mainland must lose", but more concerned about - for humans and human society, to explore the relationship between free economy and thought. In fact, if thought is a leader, why should it be proved?

Gu Xiaojun 2018-9-2 Nanjing, China

Translator: God Has eyes

Recommend Gu Xiaojun for the Nobel prize for peace, the prize in literature
http://www.sanmin.com.tw/Product/index/006709563
GuXiaojunist Philosophy [English version] ISBN 9789863586678
Preliminary study of Gu Xiaojun and his works(Liu Lihui)ISBN 9789869505178
China New Democratic movement
http://www.sanmin.com.tw/Product/index/006709564
Populist democratic
http://www.sanmin.com.tw/Product/index/006116397
Community Impartiality First
http://www.sanmin.com.tw/Product/index/005693312
Brain revolution
http://www.sanmin.com.tw/Product/index/005252719
Overthrow Lu Xun
http://www.sanmin.com.tw/Product/index/005551848
September Capriccio
http://www.sanmin.com.tw/Product/index/006827622
Gu Xiaojun novelette (1)
http://www.sanmin.com.tw/Product/index/005360512
Gu Xiaojun novelette (2)
http://www.sanmin.com.tw/Product/index/005851653
Gu Xiaojun novelette (3)
http://www.sanmin.com.tw/Product/index/006175358

贸易战是场思想的战争
 
    ——顾晓军主义:贸易战•三千九百五十四
 
 
  从表面看,贸易战是商战、是市场之争,其实贸易战从来都是思想的战争。
 
  从〈贸易战中的隐性阶段〉的分析,可看出贸易战是由没有形成自我消化能力的新兴经济体、大肆输出产品与资金及管理所造成。
 
  中美贸易战之初(百度“中美贸易战”:“2018年3月22日,美国总统特朗普在白宫签署了对中国输美产品征收……2018年3月23日,中国商务部发布了针对美国……),我在〈顾晓军时政谈(中美贸易战等)〉(2018-4-14,文章及视频)中指出“中美贸易战,大陆必输。这个输,不是输在一时一地,而是输在根子上”“为何说大陆必输、输在根子上呢?因中美贸易战、打的是自由经济的保卫战”。
 
  2018-8-27,川普说“对於美国来说,这是一场卫国战争”。这是我见到的最早的、川普的表达(见〈王岐山突谈贸易战信号微妙 不出山两大原因 大逆转〉)。
 
  于“保卫战”一说,我与川普不谋而合。一个中国民间思想家、怎么会同美国总统的提法不谋而合呢?因为,二者的思想有相同、相通之处。换言之,二者思想的根基、思想的方向、或曰思想的出发点,是一致的。这样,才会出现相同的说法。
 
  反之,中共却一直在误判美国、误判川普。中共在中美贸易战中的一再误判,最经典的证明、就是北戴河会议前的王沪宁的“失踪”与海外的种种分析与传闻,以及大陆对胡鞍钢的批判。如果不是王沪宁的误判、误导,又怎可能有“失踪”的传闻与分析呢?
 
  而按理说,贸易战也是场战争;既是战争,就应该“知己知彼,百战不殆”。那么,中共及王沪宁、胡鞍钢们是不懂“知己知彼,百战不殆”还是有其他原因?
 
  我在〈中美贸易战是思想理论的战争〉中说,中共最善玩“一盘很大很大的棋”、玩田忌赛马及三十六计等;显然,中共是深通孙子兵法之道的。那么,中共究竟输在哪里?
 
  其实,在〈中美贸易战是思想理论的战争〉中已说清。中共,输就输在思想的落后,输就输在对新思想的种种封杀。就中美贸易战,中共早在2018年4月9日、10日,就动手、做眼了,就由被海外称之为“习近平的导师”的孙立平相继发表了〈关于贸易战,只说三点看法〉与〈世界上在发生什么——四个有意思的提法〉的文章。
 
  为了打赢这场贸易战的思想的战争,孙立平在〈世界上在发生什么——四个有意思的提法〉中,将我于中美贸易战的相关思想,以教授与“习近平的导师”的身份、分别赠予他人,从而实施中共封杀我的策略。其实,这样的思想的战争、由来已久。石三生2012年9月9日发表的〈党没有思想不是人民的错〉(见《向诺贝尔和平奖、文学奖推荐顾晓军》ISBN 9789863586272)可为证。
 
  说孙立平将我于中美贸易战的相关思想、“分别赠予他人”,只需展开〈世界上在发生什么——四个有意思的提法〉——“第一个提法:过去40年全球化面临清算。这是刘煜辉先生提出来的”。卑鄙!我的〈顾晓军时政谈(中美贸易战等)〉之中就有“二、全球经济一体化”的章节,并指出“大陆除了说美国是贸易保护主义外,另一件武器是全球经济一体化。而全球经济一体化,其实是森林法则”“为何说全球经济一体化是森林法则呢?因,全球经济一体化其实就是强者主导型经济。也就是说,由强者给世界经济进行分工。”且,我对于“全球经济一体化”的反思与批判,也早就开始了(见2017-2-15的〈川普经济,与吴惠林商榷〉等)。
 
  “第二个提法:特朗普并不只是单独的个人,而是一个新兴社会运动的领袖。这是复旦大学中国研究院研究员文扬先生提出来的”、“第三个提法:精英犯了错误,命运掌握在小人物的手里。这是班农提出来的”,这“第二个提法”与“第三个提法”,更是分割我的“平民主义民主”(见《公正第一》ISBN 9789869269346,2016年4月出版;《平民主义民主》 ISBN 9789869337243,2016年10月出版),而赠予文扬和班农(见风北吹的〈实质是平民主义民主——由孙立平【世界上在发生什么——四个有意思的提法】想到的〉、森林之子的〈顾晓军的前瞩与孙立平的短视〉与石三生最近的〈他们在堵死顾晓军对川普的理论支撑〉等,及2016-09-15大宝贼转〈全球底层社会的崛起〉时的“转发按:北大博士在论证顾晓军先生提出的‘平民主义民主’的存在与可行性。”)
 
  孙立平的“第四个提法:中国的整体实力已超过美国,成为世界第一。这是胡鞍钢教授提出来的”,显然是拼凑;因为,前三个“提法”具有整体性。如此,就更不难看出孙立平的〈世界上在发生什么——四个有意思的提法〉是针对贸易战的,是对我的思想与理论的掠夺,是在蓄意肢解中美贸易战中的、自由经济一方的阵线。
 
  孙立平,煞费苦心地打2018年4月9日发〈关于贸易战,只说三点看法〉、2018年4月10日发〈世界上在发生什么——四个有意思的提法〉的组合拳,也是为王沪宁的《马克思是对的》鸣锣开道——百度百科“马克思是对的”:2018年4月27日至5月1日晚9:00,《马克思是对的》在中央电视台综合频道首播,人民网、新华网等融媒体平台同步推出。《马克思是对的》是由中宣部理论局、江苏省委宣传部、江苏省广播电视总台联合制作的5集通俗理论对话节目。
 
  有这么巧吗?“中宣部与江苏”“联合制作”?中共最善于玩“一盘很大很大的棋”,其“精妙”之处就在于——看似很漫不经心,却总是处心积虑、精心策划、巧妙安排等。如果不是我生活在南京,中宣部会与江苏联合制作吗?
 
  然而,随着王沪宁的《厉害了,我的国》、《马克思是对的》的出现,“跪求体”、“哭晕体”、“吓尿体”的“美国害怕了”、“日本吓傻了”、“欧洲后悔了”等铺天盖地,反而坚定了川普打这场贸易战的决心。
 
  我不知道——这算不算思想理论型的“高级黑”?然而,事实上是——王沪宁、孙立平、胡鞍钢等,把习近平送到了风口浪尖上。因为,中美贸易战是一场、中共赢不了、也输不起的、思想的战争。中共若战败,习近平所背负的骂名、只怕是要胜过江泽民。
 
  那么,怎么理解“中美贸易战是一场、中共赢不了、也输不起的、思想的战争”呢?“输不起”,非常好理解——输了,就真的是“中共经济崩溃论”成为现实了。而一旦中共的经济崩溃,中共还能“今天是个好日子,心想的事儿都能成”吗?
 
  而于“赢不了”与“思想的战争”,我早在〈顾晓军时政谈(中美贸易战等)〉、〈中美贸易战之断想〉与〈中美贸易战是思想理论的战争〉等文中已说清——“为何说大陆必输、输在根子上呢?因中美贸易战、打的是自由经济的保卫战”“中美贸易战的本质是什么?市场经济得继续发展下去,不容计划经济插手,必须市场说了算”“大陆连言论自由都不能落实,怎么可能有真正的自由经济呢?”
 
  贸易战,说到底——“是先进的社会形式与落后的社会形式的战争。具体说,打的是社会的纠错能力”“美苏冷战也罢、中美贸易战也罢,实际上打的不是军备竞赛、不是贸易战,而是先进的社会形式与落后的社会形式的战争。具体说,打的是社会的纠错能力。因为,民主社会自带纠错机制,而社会主义不自带纠错机制,所以必然会输”等。
 
  社会形式的先进与落后,反映出的不就是思想?所以,撒切尔夫人才敢说“你们根本不用担心中国,因为中国在未来几十年,甚至一百年内,无法给世界提供任何新思想。”然而,撒切尔夫人错了——她是顺着中共是主流社会的思路、说“你们根本不用担心中国”等,而忽略了处于裂变期的社会最容易出思想家。
 
  2018-8-20,我在〈中共如何化解贸易战?〉中提出“挤压权贵经济,藏富于民,建立起真正的消费型经济的制度和政策,含政治与社会的民主化。”这其中,“建立起真正的消费型经济的制度和政策”是关键;因为,没有形成自我消化能力的新兴经济体,必然大肆输出产品与资金及管理等。
 
  而“政治与社会的民主化”,也绝非是我这“平民主义民主”思想的缔造者,趁中共危难之际、强加给中共。其一,在《大脑革命》(ISBN 9789869198103,2015年7月出版)《公正第一》《平民主义民主》这三本书中,我就多次阐述:市场经济与政治民主是一种经济基础与上层建筑的配套。而社会主义的配套,是计划经济。社会主义,在计划经济搞不下去后,将“市场经济”拿来;然,这种拿来,也必然最终会葬送社会主义。因为,这样的嫁接水土不服。
 
  当然,中共或会考虑重回计划经济(北戴河会议期间就有此说法)。但,实际上中共已回不去了;因,“改革开放”、已破坏了实行计划经济的、愚民政治的基础。
 
  其二,待到了市场经济的领导者无法容忍——没有形成自我消化能力的新兴经济体、大肆输出产品与资金及管理时,贸易战必然开打。这不仅仅是针对中共。上世纪七十年代崛起的日本,到了八十年代,美国就曾逼他们就范、逼他们建立起真正的消费型经济的制度。台湾,亦大同小异。
 
  宋楚瑜谈蒋经国、谈“87解严”的文章,提到过“87解严”之前一两年(我记不准具体的时间),美国派代表去谈判……这个谈判,绝无可能是专门去谈“解严”。我以为,美国代表团去谈的,应该也是如何解决低价、倾销,建立起真正的消费型经济的制度的问题。“解严”,不过是市场经济与现代民主政治必然配套、而顺理成章地出现的。
 
  通过我的〈贸易战〉与〈贸易战中的隐性阶段〉,已知:贸易战,是原本的市场经济体,遭到新兴的、没有形成自我消化能力的经济制度、大肆输出产品与资金及管理时的抵抗。因此,原本的市场经济体打贸易战、是正义的。日本与台湾建立起真正的消费型经济的制度及台湾的“87解严”,是顺势而为;同样,也是顺天理应民意。
 
  在贸易战的问题上,中共于思想层面的落后,是两个梯级的落后。第一梯级,是如今马克思主义已是被世人抛弃的主义。说“马克思是对的”,不过是关起门来的自说自话。我不用作任何准备,随时可去央视与任何人辩论。而央视,能让我说吗?第二梯级,是现代民主已悄悄进入到了“平民主义民主”的阶段。我的《平民主义民主》与《中國新民運》(ISBN 9789863586371,2018年5月出版)等书中均有论述。且,美国与台湾的大选也都充分地表现了出来。连孙立平的歹毒的“第二个提法”与“第三个提法”也间接承认了“平民主义民主”的到来。
 
  所以说,贸易战就是一场思想的战争。而通过我说“中美贸易战打的是自由经济的保卫战”、川普说“对於美国来说,这是一场卫国战争”,通过孙立平做眼、发表两文章、掠夺我的思想与理论、以达到肢解贸易战中的自由经济一方的阵线,通过孙立平为王沪宁的《马克思是对的》鸣锣开道、围剿生活在南京的我,与《厉害了,我的国》、“美国害怕了”、“日本吓傻了”、“欧洲后悔了”反而坚定了川普打贸易战的决心,及我提出“挤压权贵经济,藏富于民,建立起真正的消费型经济的制度和政策”和建立消费型经济是一种必然,以及中共于思想层面的落后的两个梯级等看,中美贸易战、还不是场思想的战争吗?
 
  证明了“贸易战是场思想的战争”,本文也就该结束了。然,我却很想说明一点:其实,本文并不很在意证明“中美贸易战,大陆必输”,而更在意于——为人类与人类社会、探索自由经济与思想之间的关系。其实,思想为前导、又何须证明呢?
 
 
              顾晓军 2018-9-2 南京


(繼續閱讀...)
The recessive stage in the trade war 贸易战中的隐性阶段

The recessive stage in the trade war 贸易战中的隐性阶段


- Gu Xiaojunist:Trade war • 3953



In the "trade war", I defined the "trade war" as a "trade war, which was the original market economy. It was confronted with an emerging economic system that did not form a self-digesting ability, and the resistance to exporting products and funds and management. "There will be many people who are not easy to accept new ideas and have an inherent mindset. If so, I will lead everyone to re-understand the trade war from the perspective of the "hidden stage in the trade war."


The so-called trade wars have all the factors that caused the sudden outbreak of trade wars in the early stage. And this long (usually long) phase is the "hidden phase in the trade war." That is to say, the trade war is not a one-step process. It is a long-term invasion process that is not manifested, by emerging economies that do not 



(繼續閱讀...)
Leading China to democracy and freedom 给中国的民主与自由带路

——Read Gu Xiaojun's "September Capriccio"



Not long ago, reading Yang Xian's Biography, Yang Shen's artistic standard is "only seeking its beauty", "Yan", "Jane", "new", "odd", so I remembered the past, seven or eight years ago, in one The May 1st and 10th tribes, when they read the "September Capriccio" by Gu Shi, are the impressions of "beautiful beauty". They have been re-read recently. This is a series of articles. They have been published and have not read a few articles. They can’t help but admire them. It’s really a thinker! Now I want to come, why did I have a "beautiful" feeling for "September Capriccio"? First, this topic, and second, this style. Of course, there is no separation from the content, nor the art of separation from thought. Just as Yang Shenyan’s "Wen and Taoism are two things", "If the truth is ambiguous, it is not written", "intricately shocked", then "the change of the extreme text" The change of the mind. I think it is this change of "ideology" and the change of "extreme" thought that makes me feel a breeze in the boring ideological 



(繼續閱讀...)
Definition of trade war 贸易战的定义
- Gu Xiaojunist: Trade war • 3952


Baidu Encyclopedia: "Trade war", also known as 'commercial war', refers to the fact that some countries restrict tariffs of other countries into their domestic markets through high tariff barriers and non-tariff barriers, while competing for foreign countries through dumping and foreign exchange depreciation. The market, resulting in a series of retaliation and counter-retaliation measures."

Wikipedia: "The original meaning of the trade war is to expand the scope of the war and use the other's trade as a means of war against the target."

In the "China-US trade war", Baidu Encyclopedia said: "On March 22, 2018, US President Trump signed a presidential memorandum on the tariffs on Chinese exports to the United States at the White House; March 23, 2018, China The Ministry of Commerce has issued a list of suspension concessions for US steel and aluminum products 232 measures, and plans to impose


(繼續閱讀...)
Talk about ”a big and big chess” 漫谈“一盘很大很大的棋”

- Gu Xiaojunist: New Democratic movement • 3951

 

 

The sky is still hot, the body is still uncomfortable, and the things I want to do can't be done... Even the article in the book "Trade Wars" in the "Gu Xiaojun's Economics" is only written in the "China-US Trade War". One question> one.

 

Frustration is almost overwhelming. You don't make me comfortable, I can't be uncomfortable, right? If so, find some articles on my Blogger and push them on Twitter.

 

It was really unintentional, and Shi Sansheng’s "God or idiot of Gao Zhisheng" was pushed. After pushing the qingtingwei to learn, the number of the high ‘God’ is so funny that I don’t know how he came up. When I typed these words, the hard disk spins rapidly!!!”

 

"Hard disk spins fast?" Familiar and strange. Shi Sansheng often said that the party was arrogant about his computer and fan. About the "Gu powder group 8.30 political big case" meeting, the newly bought computer in the locker also rang.

 

If so, I said, "You have been stabilized. This means that Gao is a CCP spy," and immediately went offline. After sleeping, I will



(繼續閱讀...)
Open the horizon of trade war 打开贸易战的视野
- Gu Xiaojunist: New Democratic movement • 3950


Google's "trade war"

Google "trade war", you can see -

"Trade war": "The original intention of the trade war is to expand the scope of the war and use the other's trade as a means of war against the target."

Wikipedia: "China-US Trade Dispute 2018": "2018 Sino-US Trade Dispute, Also Known as China-US Trade War in 2018, Sino-US Trade Friction in 2018, and Sino-US Trade Disputes in 2018, is the People's Republic of China and the United States of America A trade dispute between them."

hot news:

The Epoch Times: Trade War, the United States and the United States reach consensus: the CCP’s economic model needs to change

Sina News: Xia Kedao: The United States wants to open up the second battlefield outside the trade war. China must be vigilant

Radio France International: Trade Wars Mark Long Brewing November Invited to learn the special rules of trade and Japan and 


(繼續閱讀...)
Several problems in the Sino-US trade war中美贸易战中的几个问题

- Gu Xiaojunist: New Democratic movement • 3949



The existence of Sino-US trade war


Today, in overseas media, there are two articles whose titles are eye-catching. One is that "Wang Qishan’s rare public statement and Trump's homology: China and the United States are not trade wars," and the other is "Wang Yushan's talk about trade wars." The signal is subtle and there is no big reason for the two major reasons.


In fact, these two articles are about the same thing - China and the United States do not recognize the existence of the Sino-US trade war.


Then, does the Sino-US trade war not exist? I thought: The Sino-US trade war is there. Regardless of whether the Sino-US trade war is described as "friction" or "conflict", it can only prove the existence of the



(繼續閱讀...)
Handling opinions on Shenzhen Jiashi workers and Yue Xin

Handling opinions on Shenzhen Jiashi workers and Yue Xin etc. 对深圳佳士工人及岳昕等的处理意见

- Gu Xiaojunist: New Democratic movement • 3947


Overseas article reports "Shenzhen finally cleared the field to arrest a large number of students. The left side of the game is irreversible."

My Gu Xiaojun thought that it is wrong to suppress Shenzhen Jiashi workers and Yuelu from the perspective of "ruling the country according to law" and from the freedom of speech, such as freedom of speech and procession.

However, the "June 4th" was suppressed (we did not start, let's think it was right-wing behavior. The same below), "Zero Charter" was suppressed, "Jasmine" was suppressed, 709 was suppressed... If so, Shenzhen Jia The workers and Yuelu should also be suppressed, and a bowl of water is flat.

Under the above premise, my Gu Xiaojun, after presenting the Shenzhen clearance, hereby disposes of the advice of Shenzhen Jiashi



(繼續閱讀...)
Gu Xiaojunist Economics 顾晓军主义经济学

- Gu Xiaojunist: New Democratic movement • 3946



Primer


2008-2-11, I wrote a article "The stock market continues to fall without disaster". The mainland stock market was unfortunately said by me; if so, some netizens said, "Gu Xiaojun is a philosophical one, and he said that the stock market is so accurate?"


In fact, at that time, I didn't even write about "Where the only thing is the knowledge of the egg", "Dialectic teaches you how to ridicule", "Let the materialism go to hell".


Today, I am already a recognized thinker and philosopher. Even Google has counted my "China New Democratic movement" as a philosophy (see Google "Gu Xiaojun" "Book" - "China New Democratic Movement" "Gu Xiaojun (Philosophy ) - 2018 - No preview"). It can be seen that netizens do have a vision.


The above is just one of them. Second, if I didn't engage in philosophy, I would follow the path of “the stock market continues to fall without disaster”. Am I not an economist now?


Third, "Gu Xiaojunist Philosophy" in "GuXiaojunist Philosophy (English version)". I now regret that it is necessary to let the "materialistic ideals be the knowledge of the egg", "the dialectic teaches you how to ridicule the egg", "let the materialism go to hell"



(繼續閱讀...)
Trade war, you should know 贸易战,你该知道的

- Gu Xiaojunist: New Democratic movement • 3945



In the morning, after reading the new challenge of Xi Jinping’s party and government, Mao Zuoxin’s internal mobilization ability, he wanted to write a story—Yue’s “This year coincides with the 200th anniversary of the birth of the teacher’s Marx”, which is actually the “Marx of Wang Huning’s It is right to echo the same; and Wang Huning’s "great, my country" is a conflation of the Sino-US trade war.


Therefore, Yuelu’s “supporting Shenzhen Jiashi Technology Company Workers” is actually stirring up the Sino-US trade war. And many democrats on Twitter support Yue Lu, etc., it is a fool. At least, Yuelu has been called "new left" outside Mao Zuo. Democrats support Yuelu. Isn't the brain sick?


Unexpectedly, I just wrote half of it and broke the net. After checking for a while, it was initially determined that the cat was broken. Calling people to see, it turned out that the cat is broken. I used a cat for more than a decade



(繼續閱讀...)
< 上一頁 12345678910 下一頁 >
181頁,跳至第