Silly and Cao Changqing Patronizing prostitutes don’t give - 改变 - 優仕網部落格

優仕網部落格優質部落格精選文章
自然
行事曆
S M T W T F S
            1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031         
站長

Gdlf Gdlf
♀ 39
部落格分類
文章分類
常用標籤
最新回應
Updates occur every 60 minutes.
瀏覽統計
Google+ 圈圈
恢复1
字體大小:  
Silly and Cao Changqing Patronizing prostitutes don’t give

Silly and Cao Changqing Patronizing prostitutes don’t give money, etc. 傻逼与曹长青嫖娼不给钱等等

 

- Gu Xiaojunist: New Democratic movement • 3792

 

 

There is a newly registered @gxjzs on Twitter, actually called "Gu Xiaojun's teacher," and the thread criticized me for criticizing Cao Changqing. If so, I can't help but reply.

 

First, in my memory, my teacher or I have worshipped and respected teachers, mostly silly. For example, when I was young, I felt that Lu Xun was very good. He worshipped him and studied it carefully. He discovered that Lu Xun was nothing but a silly.

 

Therefore, @gxjzs is called "Gu Xiaojun's teacher". Then, it is a silly.

 

Silly posted the full text: "Talk about Gu Xiaojun and Cao Changqing, Gu Xiaojun wrote a lot of articles belittle Cao Changqing, so he searched Cao Changqing's website and found only an article 

Silly and Cao Changqing Patronizing prostitutes don’t give money, etc. 傻逼与曹长青嫖娼不给钱等等

 

- Gu Xiaojunist: New Democratic movement • 3792

 

 

There is a newly registered @gxjzs on Twitter, actually called "Gu Xiaojun's teacher," and the thread criticized me for criticizing Cao Changqing. If so, I can't help but reply.

 

First, in my memory, my teacher or I have worshipped and respected teachers, mostly silly. For example, when I was young, I felt that Lu Xun was very good. He worshipped him and studied it carefully. He discovered that Lu Xun was nothing but a silly.

 

Therefore, @gxjzs is called "Gu Xiaojun's teacher". Then, it is a silly.

 

Silly posted the full text: "Talk about Gu Xiaojun and Cao Changqing, Gu Xiaojun wrote a lot of articles belittle Cao Changqing, so he searched Cao Changqing's website and found only an article by Cao Changqing who transferred Gu Xiaojun. He did not find any articles by Cao Changqing and Gu Xiaojun. Phenomenon What does this show? The mind, realm, and grace of the two people can be described as a high judgment. It is recommended that Mr. Gu Xiaojun reflect on this issue.

 

Second, since silly said, “Talking about Gu Xiaojun and Cao Changqing, Gu Xiaojun has written many articles degrading Cao Changqing.” First of all, it is necessary to start discussions on Gu Xiaojun’s devaluation of Cao Changqing’s many articles, and whether they are right, if they are wrong and where they are wrong. Is this the truth? Silly actually avoided the content of the article, and compared what "breast, realm and tolerance", so, is it not stupid to be stupid?

 

Third, "mind, realm, and tolerance" is a kind of personality. In terms of human qualities, first of all, we do not look at "breast, realm, and generality," but look at its essence. So, what is the essence of Cao Changqing? I just searched on Twitter — zouzou @yanxiang1967: The hypocrite Cao Changqing once gave the money as a reporter, and he also wanted sex workers to be moral scum!

 

Obviously, the nature or quality of Cao Changqing is far inferior to that of Gu Xiaojun. In addition to basic qualities, we should also look at political quality. I also just searched on Twitter – Bush Washington @BushWashington1: Lai Jianping, Zhang Jian, Cao Changqing and so on. In fact, they did not look at Guo's spy video at all.

 

If so, Cao Changqing is nothing more than a money-spotted item. It is not about political quality. Is it not? What is more - Chen Jun @ sixiang3: Bao Yu, Gao Yu, Guo Wengui, Yang Jianli, Luther, Hu Jia, Cao Changqing, Guo Baosheng, and Zhao Yan are all backgrounds of the various factions! Collaborate with each other, touting, and help altogether young people! Fight political opponents! The communicative spy system has penetrated into the interior and exterior for a long time. They have become celebrities and hoodwink people. Evidence: goo.gl/PwaLRG goo.gl/sSBSzM

 

Silly friends, what else can you say? Moreover, Cao Changqing did not miss me but he was bad –

 

In 2015, I published "Overthrow Lu Xun" in Taiwan, and Cao Changqing and the spokesperson Yang Hengjun issued concurrent articles "Lu Xun is a giant who can not beat down" and "Lu Xun and Hu Shi are indispensable," blocking me. In Cao Changqing’s “Wang Xi’s gallbladder mice” and other articles in the article “The kind of virtue like certain nostrils looting in the sky”, “I said in the article “Lu Xun is unbeatable giant”” "Sexual people'" and so on are also jealous of me.

 

Silly friends, what you call “mind, realm, and magnanimity,” Cao Changqing not only did not, but at least I did not Gu Xiaojun magnanimous and outrageous. Not satisfied, you let Cao Changqing himself say.

 

 

Gu Xiaojun 2018-4-10 NanjingChina

 

Translator: God Has eyes

 

Populist democratic http://store.showwe.tw/books.aspx?b=110447

Community Impartiality First http://store.showwe.tw/books.aspx?b=10730

Brain revolution http://store.showwe.tw/books.aspx?b=3533

Overthrow Lu Xun http://store.showwe.tw/books.aspx?b=1058

Gu Xiaojun novelette (3) http://store.showwe.tw/books.aspx?b=111632

Gu Xiaojun novelette (2) http://store.showwe.tw/books.aspx?b=10823

Gu Xiaojun novelette (1) http://store.showwe.tw/books.aspx?b=10215

 

 

 

 

傻逼与曹长青嫖娼不给钱等等

 

    ——顾晓军主义:新民运三千七百九十二

 

 

  推特上有个刚注册的@gxjzs,居然叫“顾晓军之师”,还跟帖批评我对曹长青的批评。如是,我就不能不回复了。

 

  其一,在我的记忆中,我的老师或我曾崇拜过、尊之为师的,大多是傻逼。比如,我年少时,觉得鲁迅很了不起,对他顶礼膜拜,后仔细一研究,发现鲁迅不过是一傻逼。

 

  因此,@gxjzs既叫“顾晓军之师”,那么,也就是一傻逼。

 

  傻逼发帖的全文:“谈一下顾晓军和曹长青,顾晓军写了很多文章贬低曹长青,于是搜索了一下曹长青的网站,只搜到一篇曹长青转载顾晓军的文章,没找到任何曹长青评论顾晓军的文章。此一现象这说明了什么?二人的胸怀、境界和气度可谓高下立判,建议顾晓军先生,在这方面该反省反省。”

 

  其二,傻逼既然说“谈一下顾晓军和曹长青,顾晓军写了很多文章贬低曹长青”,首先就该展开议论顾晓军贬低曹长青的很多文章、究竟对不对,如果错了、又错在哪里。是不是这道理?傻逼居然避开文章内容,而比较什么“胸怀、境界和气度”,如此,岂不是傻得不能再傻了吗?

 

  其三,“胸怀、境界和气度”属人品一类。而人品类,首先不看“胸怀、境界和气度”,而看其本质。那么,曹长青的本质又如何呢?我刚在推特上搜索到——zouzou @yanxiang1967:伪君子曹长青曾以记者身份嫖娼不给钱,还要挟性工作者,谓道德败类!

 

  显然,曹长青的本质或曰品质,远不如我顾晓军。而除了基本品质外,还应该看政治品质。我也刚在推特上搜索到——Bush Washington @BushWashington1:赖建平,张健,曹长青等挺郭的,实际上他们根本不看郭特务的视频的,都是给钱就干的角色。

 

  如是,曹长青不过是个见钱眼开的货色,谈不上政治品质,是不?更有甚者——陈军 @sixiang3:鲍彤、高瑜、郭文贵、杨建利、路德、胡佳、曹长青、郭宝胜、赵岩都是共匪各派特务背景!相互配合、吹捧,对共匪小骂大帮忙!打击政敌!共匪特务系统对内对外的渗透很久,把他们打造成名人,忽悠民众。证据:goo.gl/PwaLRG goo.gl/sSBSzM

 

  傻逼朋友,你还有什么可说的?况且,曹长青也不是没有骂过我,而是他阴坏——

 

  2015年,我在台湾出版《打倒鲁迅》一书,曹长青与特务杨恒均同时发组合文章《鲁迅是打不倒的巨人》、《鲁迅与胡适,缺一不可》阻击我。曹长青的《王朔这个胆小鼠》等文中的“像某些鼻孔朝天的半吊子故意损人的那种德性”、“我在《鲁迅是打不倒的巨人》一文中谈到的那种‘痞性的人’”等,也是骂我。

 

  傻逼朋友,你所说的“胸怀、境界和气度”,曹长青不仅没有,还至少没有我顾晓军坦荡、磊落。不服,你让曹长青自己说。

 

 

              顾晓军 2018-4-10 南京

 

瀏覽次數:104|回應簽到列印

分享:


0
延伸閱讀
(0)
回 應
共有 0 則回應
你是否想要回應?
註冊以獲得一個免費帳戶,或登入(如果你已經是會員)